Are Racist Crisps ACTUALLY racist?
Should Racist Crisps be banned?
advertisement
The latest blow for controversial snack Racist Crisps could mean the end for prejudiced nibbles everywhere. No real surprise you may say but don't be too fucking hasty, Racist Crisps are facing the axe for not being racist enough!
A leaked document possibly from the Commission for Racial Equality, possibly not, sensationally accuses the crisp of 'racial ambiguity'. The problem lies in how the crisps are meant to be used. An excerpt from the leaked document reads:
... the Blacks variety come in a brown bag but the Whites come in green and the Jews in purple - what the fuck is that all about? I can see how the flavours might be related to racial stereotypes with the Blacks being BBQ beef and the Whites being
Ready Salted (salt being white) but then surely the Jews flavour should be Pork or something like that.
Gareth Pinkshaft, social commentator and former racist, disagrees with the findings but added that if the crisps are meant to be racist in this way the Jews flavour could be prawn cocktail, a more common variety of crisp and still forbidden by Jewish tradition.
Mr. Lee, owner of Mr. Lee's Chinese chip shop and Laundry, chipped in: "the real racism in this whole affair is the absence of a Chinese variety - surely this ommission alone is racism in everything but actuality."
What does this mean for Racist Crisps? Under the 1979 Confusing Consumables Act, racist or gay foods must be clearly labelled or be withdrawn.
